Singapore High Court interprets vital term of Competition Act in case of price-fixing by warehouse operators

Singapore High Court interprets vital term of Competition Act in case of price-fixing by warehouse operators


‘By object’ under section 34 of the Act refers to conduct that has ‘manifest anti-competitive economic rationale’

[SINGAPORE] The Singapore High Court has defined a vital term of the Competition Act in the first appeal under this law, providing clarity on what conduct constitutes a restriction of competition.

In a 113-page landmark judgment published on Tuesday (Jun 30), Justice Philip Jeyaretnam interpreted the phrase “by object” under section 34 of the Competition Act to refer to conduct that has a “manifest anti-competitive economic rationale”.

Such conduct, as objectively assessed, has the aim, purpose or rationale to prevent, restrict or distort competition within the relevant market.



Source link

Posted in

Liam Redmond

Leave a Comment